The River

Thursday, July 01, 2004

“Fahrenheit 9/11” Critics

From the left:

It’s incoherent because he tried to cover too much.

He didn’t cover enough. He didn’t talk about PNAC!

He didn’t make the film I would have made. He didn’t tell the American people EVERYTHING, like I would have.

Don’t make FUN of the Bushies, just give people the facts – that’s entertainment. The BBC would have been a useful guide here.

This (phenomenally successful) film didn’t tell ME anything new, so it failed.

From the far left:

What? Like Gore wouldn’t have invaded Iraq?

From the center:

No criticism. Don't plan to see it; it’s leftist propaganda. I’ll stick to the evening news for my unbiased, propaganda-free information.

Dodgeball was good.

From the right:

This isn’t a documentary, it’s a (gasp) polemic!

Well, Christopher Hitchens nailed it. What a brilliant writer.

I…I…I …SAW it! It’s HORRIBLE! It is just so venal, so driven by hatred of Bush. And Bush is just trying to protect us from the terrorists.

Editing, trickery..he’s just like Limbaugh, only worse (but Limbaugh's a good entertainer and makes some good points).

He messed up on the Saudi flights! He messed up on the Saudi flights!

From the far right:

When the world is ruled by the Islamofascists, I’ll know which traitor to blame the most.

From a humble weblog writer:

Michael Moore has made a film suggesting the Bushies are anti-democratic warmongering profiteers and the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq are complete fuckups, mass murder for money, oil, and power lust, covered over in transparent lies enabled by the media.

Good on ya, Mike.

Oh, and the Saudi flights…probably some of Mike’s patented fast and loose editing is leading people to believe they flew out while all other planes were grounded, although he apparently says they left "after September 13." If we can all agree that video/film (and film editing) is potentially the most powerful form of lying ever invented, no matter who uses it, we might get somewhere.

interesting blog you have.
i invite you to visit the following site:

ws domains
Nice blog. Have you seen your google rating? BlogFlux It's Free and you can add a Little Script to your site that will tell everyone your ranking. I think yours was a 3. I guess you'll have to check it out.

Computer News
China's Google rockets on debut
It was a remarkable debut. Chinese search engine's shares sold in the United States for US$27 ($39) - then surged on day one to close at US$122.54 ($177.46).

Friday's result was the biggest first-day gain for a new listing in the US for five years.

Investors had more than quadrupled their money.

An analyst in New York with, a website devoted to initial public offerings, John Fitzgibbon, said: "This one is the return to the internet bubble. Last time we saw a deal skyrocket was during the frothy IPO markets of 1999 and 2000."

Then came the post-mortem.

Some analysts said the internet search engine could have had an even better payday for itself if underwriters had sold the deal at a higher price to begin with.

"It looks to me like the underwriters should have had a better indication of the appetite for this stock than they did," said Donald Straszheim, president of Straszheim Global Advisors.

Investors were eager to own a stake in a company that many say could grow as dramatically as Google and is based in a country itself undergoing explosive growth.

But other analysts are not so sure the underwriters made a mistake, given that the company's shares were priced at a relatively high multiple of revenues.

"It wasn't priced out of line with the rest of the market. In a situation like this, you're dealing with the unpredictability of the after market," said Tom Taulli, of Instream Partners in Newport Beach, California.

At issue is the underwriting process. Banks selling shares to the public - in this case Credit Suisse First Boston, Goldman Sachs, and Piper Jaffray - are paid to use quantitative models to determine a fair price for shares, but also to gauge investor demand.

Underwriting has both subjective and objective elements, making definitive evaluation of a bank's performance difficult. In this case, demand for the IPO was evidently outsized, but so were the unknowns for the company.

"We don't know the potential impact of censorship in China, or how quickly the internet will grow there," said David Menlow, president of Had the IPO been priced higher and then fallen in the first day of trading, investors could have sued. chairman and chief executive Robin Li, speaking on CNBC, said he was not upset by the potential lost proceeds of the IPO because the company had only sold a small portion of itself, and had significantly more growth ahead.

But University of Florida Professor Jay Ritter, an IPO expert, said left money on the table by introducing the shares at a level well below where they ended hours later.

Copyright © - 2005 Entireweb

Nice Blog

Best Wishes

I have a site 80 million Down Loadable Movies If you have the time stop by.
Post a Comment